home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2189>
- <title>
- Sep. 30, 1991: Men, Women and Tears
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Sep. 30, 1991 Curing Infertility
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 84
- Men, Women And Tears
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Philip Dunne
- </p>
- <p> President George Bush, while watching on television his
- nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Clarence Thomas, describe
- to the Senate Judiciary Committee the lack of indoor plumbing
- and other deprivations of his humble childhood, informs us that
- he was moved to tears. In his own words: "I choked up on it."
- </p>
- <p> This is not the first time this year that the Chief
- Executive has indulged in a manly effusion of moisture. On June
- 6 he told a gathering of Southern Baptists that last January,
- while praying just before he let slip the dogs of war, "I had
- the tears start down the cheeks." There was even a hint of
- further tears in his eyes as he made this confession, which,
- according to newspaper reports, was rewarded by the crowd with
- a prolonged standing ovation.
- </p>
- <p> Since then there have been a few negative reactions from
- critics who seem to consider tears a sign of weakness in the
- human male. Unfortunately, it appears that there are still some
- among us who refuse to move with the times, and remain captives
- of an outworn Victorian ethic.
- </p>
- <p> The notion that men should not display their emotions in
- public, and most specifically that they should never shed tears,
- was enshrined during the 19th century in the Spartan code of
- English public schools, which popularized the doctrine of the
- stiff upper lip, and was articulated by many writers, from early
- Victorian Charles Kingsley ("Men must work, and women must
- weep") to late Victorian "Mr. Dooley" ("Among men...wet eye
- manes dhry heart").
- </p>
- <p> In this more enlightened age we no longer deny the boon of
- tears to half our population, nor the joys of honest labor to
- the other half. Today, doubly reversing Kingsley, women must
- work--or else--and men, far from keeping a stiff upper lip,
- must "let it all hang out," especially if they hope to get
- ahead in politics. There are cogent historical precedents.
- </p>
- <p> A case in point is the 1952 presidential election, when
- vice-presidential candidate Richard M. Nixon averted political
- disaster for the ticket of Dwight D. Eisenhower and himself when
- he delivered his famous Checkers speech. As California's junior
- Senator, he had accepted a regular allowance from a group of
- wealthy Los Angeles businessmen, and there appeared to be real
- danger that he would be dropped from the ticket. In his speech,
- he neglected to answer the charges directly, but informed a
- listening electorate, with quavering voice and moistened eye,
- that he was a virtual pauper, whose sole assets were a little
- dog named Checkers and his wife's cloth coat.
- </p>
- <p> Nixon's judicious employment of his tear ducts enthralled
- the nation and helped propel his ticket to victory over Adlai
- E. Stevenson, who even in defeat clung to the discredited
- Victorian ethic by quoting Abraham Lincoln's anecdote about a
- little boy who stubbed his toe and said that it hurt too much
- to laugh but he was too big to cry. Poor Stevenson, a prisoner
- of the past, deserved to be a loser. For the more up-to-date
- Nixon, the prize was the vice presidency and, 16 years later,
- the White House itself.
- </p>
- <p> All who can remember 1952 experienced a sharp jolt of deja
- vu 35 years later during the Iran-contra hearings of 1987. When
- the Reagan Administration nominated Lieut. Colonel Oliver North
- as its designated fall guy, North's brilliant attorney, Brendan
- Sullivan Jr., had his client not only boldly defy Marine Corps
- protocol by appearing before the congressional panel in full
- uniform with a chestful of decorations but also present his
- defense with the same quaver of voice and modicum of manly
- moisture in the eye that had served Nixon so well. The result
- was a tidal wave of Olliemania that swept the country, made
- lying to Congress a paradigm of patriotism, and is still fondly
- recalled by those who relish the fine art of political
- lachrymosity.
- </p>
- <p> A little later, in a semipolitical setting, television
- evangelist Jimmy Swaggart, confessing to a sin or two here and
- there, employed the same strategy but different tactics, opting
- for all-out bawling on camera. And, just as it worked for the
- fictional Elmer Gantry, so, in a rare case of art imitating art,
- it rewarded Elmer's analogue in real life.
- </p>
- <p> But still, none of these stellar performances can compare
- with that of President Bush. Like the old vaudevillian Ted
- Healy with his famous triple slap across the faces of the Three
- Stooges, the President achieved three objectives with one
- stroke: to evoke a nation's sympathy for a brave man's tears,
- to present this effusion of salt water in a religious setting,
- and to remind us of a Commander in Chief's brilliant military
- triumph in the gulf.
- </p>
- <p> Future Presidents who find themselves faced with the awful
- prospect of sending men and women into battle will be comforted
- and inspired by his example. It is a pity that such of his
- predecessors in the White House as Abraham Lincoln and Franklin
- D. Roosevelt, each bearing on his shoulders the burden of a
- nation in dire peril, should be forced by the Victorian ethic
- to forgo the solace of a good cry. And then there was General
- George Washington at Valley Forge, who reportedly cried as
- seldom as he lied.
- </p>
- <p> But it must be admitted that to one entire class of
- American citizens, the strictures of an antediluvian past still
- seem to apply. Representative Patricia Schroeder, announcing
- her withdrawal from the 1988 presidential race for lack of
- funds, was greeted by her supporters with such a storm of
- affectionate protest that she was moved to tears. For this she
- was castigated, not only by supercilious males but also by a
- gaggle of superheated feminists, as just another weak woman,
- temperamentally unfitted for the presidency.
- </p>
- <p> If there is a moral to all of this, it could be that in
- today's political climate, men may weep, but women must prove
- themselves made of sterner stuff.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-